John McCarthy: Architect of Artificial Intelligence and Its Enduring Future Impact

I. Introduction: John McCarthy's Enduring Legacy in Artificial Intelligence

John McCarthy (1927–2011) stands as a monumental figure in computer science and artificial intelligence, widely recognized not only for coining the term "Artificial Intelligence" but for laying much of the foundational theoretical and practical groundwork that continues to shape the field.¹ His contributions span seminal work in programming languages, operating systems, and the very philosophical underpinnings of machine intelligence. His academic journey, from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) to Princeton University, and his subsequent influential roles at Dartmouth College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and Stanford University, positioned him at the epicenter of early computing innovations.¹

This report will explore how McCarthy's foundational contributions—from the formalization of AI as a discipline and the creation of the LISP programming language to his pioneering work in time-sharing and common sense reasoning—continue to profoundly impact the trajectory of AI. It will delve into his intellectual foresight, including his early predictions, later critiques, and philosophical engagements, demonstrating their enduring relevance to contemporary challenges and the future development of intelligent machines. The central argument is that understanding McCarthy's original vision and subsequent reflections is crucial for navigating the complex future of artificial intelligence.

McCarthy's contributions were not merely historical milestones; they were conceptual breakthroughs that continue to resonate. For instance, the evolution of "cloud computing" from his "time-sharing" vision ² illustrates how his ideas addressed fundamental problems rather than transient technological challenges. Similarly, ongoing debates surrounding explainable AI and the pursuit of common sense in machines ⁹ highlight the persistent relevance of his early work. This suggests that truly impactful scientific contributions often define the very vocabulary and conceptual frameworks for future generations, making them perennially significant. McCarthy's work thus provides a critical historical and conceptual lens through which to understand and address current and future challenges in AI, emphasizing the importance of robust theoretical foundations alongside technological advancements.

II. The Genesis of Artificial Intelligence: Coining the Term and the Dartmouth Conference

In the mid-1950s, the burgeoning field of machine intelligence was characterized by a variety of ambiguous terms such as "Automata Studies," "Cybernetics," and "Complex Information Processing".¹ John McCarthy, then an assistant professor of mathematics at Dartmouth College, recognized the need for a unifying concept. In 1955, he coined the term "Artificial Intelligence" ¹, defining it precisely as "the science and engineering of making intelligent machines".³ This definition provided a clear objective and a distinct identity for the nascent discipline, moving beyond its ambiguous predecessors.

The formalization of AI as a distinct field was further cemented by the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence in 1956. McCarthy co-organized this seminal workshop with Marvin Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude Shannon.³ Widely considered the birthplace of AI as a distinct academic discipline, the conference aimed to explore the conjecture that "every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be constructed to simulate it".⁴ The participants, a diverse group of mathematicians, computer scientists, and cognitive scientists, engaged in discussions on topics that remain central to AI today, including Natural Language Processing, Neural Networks, Computational Theory, Abstraction, and Creativity.⁸ This interdisciplinary approach was crucial for establishing AI's broad scope and fostering a collaborative research environment.¹¹

The act of coining "Artificial Intelligence" provided the field with a clear identity and rallied researchers around a common goal.¹¹ However, this naming choice also inherently set up a direct comparison with human intelligence.¹² This comparison, while inspiring ambitious research, could also lead to cycles of overconfidence and subsequent disappointment ¹¹ when the complexities of achieving human-level AI proved far greater than initially anticipated.¹⁴ The term itself, by focusing on "artificial" human-like intelligence, implicitly steered early research towards symbolic AI paradigms ¹², which sought to replicate human reasoning processes through explicit rules and representations. This historical trajectory has created a persistent tension between the aspiration for human-like intelligence and the practical limitations of achieving it, influencing research funding and public perception over decades.

The Dartmouth participants were notably optimistic, believing that significant progress toward human-level AI could be made within "a couple of summers".¹¹ McCarthy himself later admitted to being "overly optimistic" in the 1960s, realizing that human-level general intelligence was "far from" being achieved and that he had "underestimated the complexity of human thought".¹⁴ This pattern highlights a recurring theme in AI development: periods of intense optimism often followed by "AI winters" or periods of reduced funding and progress when initial predictions fail to materialize. The current global pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) continues to grapple with this inherent complexity ¹¹, demonstrating that fundamental challenges in AI are deeply rooted and require sustained, long-term research rather than short-term bursts of enthusiasm. The history of AI, originating from Dartmouth, is thus marked by cycles of hype and disillusionment. McCarthy's self-reflection offers a valuable lesson in managing expectations for future AI development, emphasizing that scientific progress is a long-term endeavor involving both breakthroughs and failures.

The following table summarizes John McCarthy's foundational contributions and their enduring impact on AI's future, providing a concise overview of his diverse influence.

Table 1: John McCarthy's Foundational Contributions and Enduring Impact on AI's Future

III. LISP: A Language for Symbolic AI and Beyond

Recognizing the limitations of existing programming languages like FORTRAN for the complex symbolic manipulation required by AI tasks, McCarthy embarked on developing a new language. This led to the creation of LISP (LISt Processing) in 1958, with its seminal publication in 1960.² LISP was founded on the mathematical theory of recursive functions and drew heavily from Alonzo Church's lambda calculus.² Its fundamental departure from procedural languages lay in its approach: a LISP program is a function applied to data, rather than a sequence of procedural steps.¹⁷ Crucially, LISP allowed programs and data to share the same simple list structure, making it uniquely suited for symbolic computation, which was a cornerstone of early AI research.¹⁷

LISP's design features proved instrumental in enabling the advancements of symbolic AI. Its ability for programs to operate on other programs as data facilitated the writing of "self-modifying programs" capable of "learning" through rote memorization.¹⁷ This made LISP the programming language of choice for AI applications throughout the 1960s and 1970s.³ Its infinite extensibility was a key advantage; new functions could be added with the same importance as built-in commands, and even the language's syntax could be redefined.¹⁸ This flexibility made LISP an ideal prototyping tool, allowing researchers to rapidly experiment with and refine AI algorithms and systems.¹⁸

Beyond its central role in AI, LISP's influence on broader computer science was profound. It pioneered several concepts that are now ubiquitous in software development. These include garbage collection, a method of automatic memory management invented by McCarthy around 1959 to solve problems in LISP.² LISP also saw the first implementations of optimizing compilers, tail recursion removal, object-oriented systems and graphics, pure functional programming, and logic programming.¹⁸ The architectural principles embedded in LISP continue to resonate, with many modern compilers and systems, such as GNU Emacs, being "morally Lisp" or having been prototyped in it.¹⁸ This demonstrates the lasting impact of LISP's design on the evolution of computing itself.

LISP was not merely a programming language for AI; it was a paradigm-shifting language. Its design principles, including functional programming, symbolic computation, and the treatment of code as data, profoundly influenced subsequent language design and software engineering practices far beyond the confines of AI. The fact that concepts like garbage collection and object-oriented programming were first explored or implemented within the LISP ecosystem demonstrates a direct causal link between McCarthy's language design and the evolution of computing itself. This illustrates how theoretical computer science, when applied creatively, can lead to widespread practical innovations, setting the stage for more powerful and flexible software development methodologies that continue to evolve today. LISP's legacy extends beyond its role as AI's initial lingua franca; it fundamentally shaped the evolution of programming languages and software development, underscoring McCarthy's impact on the broader field of computer science.

IV. Pioneering Time-Sharing and the Vision of Utility Computing

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, computers were exceptionally scarce and expensive resources, typically serving only one user at a time through batch processing. John McCarthy recognized this limitation and pioneered the concept and development of time-sharing systems.¹ His vision was to create an operating system that would permit "each user of a computer to behave as though he were in sole control of a computer," even though multiple users were drawing from a single machine.²³ He was instrumental in the creation of three of the very earliest time-sharing systems: the Compatible Time-Sharing System (CTSS), the BBN Time-Sharing System, and the Dartmouth Time-Sharing System.² This innovation significantly broadened access to computing resources, democratizing technology that was previously limited to a select few.¹

McCarthy's foresight extended beyond merely technical implementation. In a remarkably prophetic speech at MIT's centennial in 1961, he publicly suggested the idea of "utility computing".² He proposed that "computing power and even specific applications could be sold through the utility business model (like water or electricity)".² This vision was a direct precursor to the modern concepts of on-demand computing and services.

The profound impact of McCarthy's time-sharing innovation on the digital landscape is undeniable. His colleague, Lester Earnest, explicitly stated that "The Internet would not have happened nearly as soon as it did except for the fact that John initiated the development of time-sharing systems. We keep inventing new names for time-sharing. It came to be called servers... Now we call it cloud computing. That is still just time-sharing. John started it".² This highlights a direct causal link between McCarthy's pioneering work and the ubiquitous computing infrastructure that underpins the modern digital world. His work transformed computing from a localized, specialized resource into a globally accessible, on-demand service.

McCarthy's work in time-sharing and utility computing represents a foundational shift from computing as a scarce, specialized resource to a globally accessible, on-demand service. By enabling multiple users to access a single, expensive computer, he effectively democratized access to computing power.¹ His "utility computing" concept foresaw a future where computing was a commodity, much like electricity or water. This vision directly led to the development of servers, the Internet, and ultimately, cloud computing.² This illustrates a profound ripple effect where a technical innovation, time-sharing, directly enabled a new economic model, utility computing, which, in turn, facilitated massive societal shifts, including ubiquitous internet access and cloud-based services. These shifts have impacted everything from global business operations to personal communication, fundamentally altering daily life and economic models worldwide.

V. Common Sense Reasoning and Logical AI: The Advice Taker and Beyond

A central and persistent theme in John McCarthy's research was the quest for common sense in artificial intelligence. Inspired by the principles of formal logic dating back to Aristotle, he aimed to create machines that could reason and learn from experience as effectively as humans, moving beyond simply executing pre-programmed, rigid behaviors.¹ He articulated his belief that a program possesses "common sense if it automatically deduces for itself a sufficiently wide class of immediate consequences of anything it is told and what it already knows".²⁷ This definition emphasized the ability of a machine to infer and adapt based on general knowledge, rather than being explicitly programmed for every possible scenario.

This pursuit culminated in his conceptual program, the Advice Taker, proposed in his seminal 1959 paper, "Programs with Common Sense".² The Advice Taker was designed to accept "advice"—premises defined in a formal language, such as predicate calculus—and then draw conclusions from these statements, thereby improving its own behavior.²¹ A key innovation of this approach was the emphasis on declarative programming, where knowledge is stated as facts and rules rather than as a sequence of procedural steps.²⁶ This allowed the system to leverage prior knowledge and logical consequences, a significant departure from the imperative programming common at the time.

The Advice Taker concept served as a direct precursor to the knowledge-based systems and expert systems that gained prominence in the 1980s and 1990s.²¹ McCarthy's insistence on logical reasoning and formal knowledge representation—utilizing tools like predicate logic, situation calculus, and circumscription—laid the foundational groundwork for automated reasoning, knowledge graphs, semantic networks, and frame-based systems.² His work on circumscription, in particular, was crucial for addressing the challenge of reasoning under uncertainty and incomplete information, a critical requirement for AI systems operating in the unpredictable real world.²

McCarthy's vision for common sense AI, while foundational for the symbolic AI paradigm, largely remained theoretical during his lifetime, not achieving the widespread practical fruition seen with deep learning today.⁴ However, the current limitations of modern deep learning models, particularly in areas requiring true understanding, robust reasoning, and generalization beyond their training data ⁹, highlight the enduring importance of McCarthy's common sense agenda. The "unexplainability" of many contemporary neural networks ⁹ stands in stark contrast to McCarthy's logical, explainable approach. This observation suggests a cyclical pattern in AI development, where different paradigms gain prominence, but fundamental challenges, such as common sense and explainability, persist. These challenges often lead to a renewed appreciation for earlier, perhaps overlooked, theoretical foundations, potentially through the development of hybrid AI models that combine the strengths of both symbolic and connectionist approaches. McCarthy's work on common sense reasoning and logical AI, though overshadowed by empirical methods in recent decades, thus remains critically relevant for addressing the limitations of current AI systems, particularly in areas of explainability, robust generalization, and true understanding.

VI. Philosophical Dimensions of AI: Intelligence, Consciousness, and Ethics

John McCarthy's intellectual contributions extended deeply into the philosophical implications of artificial intelligence, demonstrating his comprehensive understanding of the field's profound societal and existential questions. He engaged rigorously with what it means to ascribe mental qualities to machines. In his 1979 paper, "Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines," he argued that it is legitimate and often useful to attribute beliefs, knowledge, free will, intentions, and consciousness to machines, provided such ascription conveys the same information as it would for a person.⁸ While initially distinguishing intelligence from consciousness, suggesting that intelligent machines might not possess consciousness ⁸, he later expressed a more nuanced and evolving perspective, stating in an interview that "yes, machines can have consciousness".²⁸ This evolution in thought reflects the inherent complexity and ongoing debate surrounding these concepts.

McCarthy also delved into the intricate relationship between free will and determinism in the context of machines. He proposed the concept of "simple deterministic free will" for computers, arguing that a deterministic process involving an agent's evaluation of available choices is compatible with the notion of free will.²⁸ He believed that computers could understand and even be taught theories of free will ²⁸, suggesting that meaningful agency could exist even within a deterministic framework.

A cornerstone of McCarthy's philosophical stance was his conviction regarding the indispensable role of philosophy in AI development. He explicitly stated that "AI needs many ideas that have hitherto been studied only by philosophers" to achieve human-level intelligence, including fundamental concepts of knowledge, free will, and ethics.³² He contended that traditional philosophical problems take on new forms when considered in the context of designing robots ³², emphasizing that a robot, to operate independently and understand the world, requires a "general world view" to organize facts.³² Furthermore, he stressed the critical responsibility of designers to build ethical attitudes directly into programs to prevent unethical actions.³²

Beyond theoretical discussions, McCarthy was a vocal advocate for ethical considerations in AI development. He was a "vocal critic of the commercialization of artificial intelligence," expressing "concern about the potential for AI to be used for negative purposes, such as military applications".³¹ He consistently "argued for the importance of ethical considerations when developing AI systems" ²², demonstrating a remarkable foresight into the societal responsibilities that accompany technological advancement. His concerns directly prefigured contemporary debates on AI alignment, responsible AI, and the broader societal impact of advanced AI systems.

McCarthy's consistent engagement with philosophical questions—including consciousness, free will, and ethics—demonstrates his understanding that AI's ultimate goals, such as achieving human-level intelligence, cannot be realized through purely technical means.³² His views on "ascribing mental qualities" ⁸ and his insistence on the need for ethical frameworks ²² directly prefigure contemporary debates on AI alignment, responsible AI, and the societal impact of advanced AI systems. The fact that these philosophical questions are now mainstream in AI research, leading to the establishment of AI ethics boards and mandates for explainable AI, illustrates a direct causal link to his early foresight. This underscores that the future success of AI hinges on addressing these complex, interdisciplinary challenges, confirming that AI's future is as much a philosophical and ethical endeavor as it is a technical one.

The table below outlines McCarthy's key philosophical stances and their direct relevance to the challenges faced by modern AI.

Table 2: McCarthy's Philosophical Stances and Their Relevance to Modern AI Challenges

VII. McCarthy's Predictions and the Evolution of AI Development

John McCarthy's career was characterized by both ambitious predictions and candid self-reflection regarding the pace of AI progress. As previously noted, he was "overly optimistic" in the 1960s about the rapid arrival of human-level AI, a prediction that, as he later acknowledged, "didn't pan out".¹⁴ He openly admitted to underestimating "the complexity of human thought" and emphasized that scientific progress involves "failures as much as it is about breakthroughs".¹⁴ His 2005 paper, "The Future of AI -- A Manifesto," reiterated human-level AI as the long-term goal, noting that even then, machines could not emulate complex tasks such as playing master-level Go or learning science from the Internet.¹⁵ This self-critical perspective offers a valuable historical lesson in managing expectations for AI development, highlighting the profound challenges that persist despite significant advancements.

A particularly prescient critique from McCarthy concerned his skepticism towards purely "empirical methods" like neural networks, which have come to dominate much of contemporary AI. He argued that the "designers of such systems would not understand how they work".⁹ He believed these data-driven systems lacked "sound logical foundations" and could not achieve "true generalization" or genuine "understanding" beyond their specific training data.⁹ In contrast, he advocated for logical, top-down approaches, asserting their superiority for achieving explainability, robust understanding, and the ability to handle out-of-distribution data and symbolic reasoning.⁹ This critique is remarkably relevant today, given the pervasive "black box" problem in deep learning and the ongoing, intensive research into explainable AI (XAI).

Despite his cautions regarding the pace and methods, McCarthy's foundational work laid the groundwork for numerous current and future AI applications. His development of the "hand-eye" computer system, which enabled a computer to "see" blocks via a video camera and control a robotic arm for stacking exercises ⁵, directly foreshadowed modern robotics and computer vision systems. His extensive research into common sense reasoning ²⁶ remains highly relevant to contemporary efforts in knowledge representation and reasoning, which are crucial for developing more robust and adaptable AI. Beyond these specific technical contributions, the broader impact of AI, rooted in the foundations he helped establish, is evident across virtually every industry today. This includes healthcare (revolutionizing patient care, clinical decision-making, and robot-assisted surgeries), education (enabling personalized learning experiences and automated tutoring), law (streamlining legal processes and providing AI-powered advice), cybersecurity (enhancing threat detection), and fashion (assisting with trend forecasting and supply chain optimization).³⁴ These applications demonstrate AI's potential to significantly boost productivity for professionals and its implications for job displacement across various sectors.³⁴

The tension between McCarthy's logical, symbolic approach and the empirical, connectionist methods that currently dominate AI is a recurring theme throughout AI's history.⁹ His criticisms of empirical methods for their inherent lack of explainability and true generalization capabilities remain highly pertinent to current debates about the limitations of large language models and neural networks. This historical perspective suggests that AI progress is not a linear ascent following a single paradigm, but rather a dynamic interplay of different approaches. When challenges arise within one paradigm, such as the difficulty of achieving common sense or robust generalization in neural networks, it often leads to a renewed appreciation for the insights and theoretical foundations offered by another, such as formal logic. The future of AI may well involve a sophisticated synthesis of these approaches, combining the strengths of data-driven learning with the robustness, explainability, and generalization capabilities of logical reasoning, thereby validating McCarthy's insistence on strong theoretical and logical foundations.

VIII. Conclusion: John McCarthy's Indelible Mark on AI's Trajectory

John McCarthy's legacy is defined by his profound and multifaceted contributions to computer science and artificial intelligence. From coining the field's name and organizing its foundational conference to developing its primary language (LISP) and envisioning its future infrastructure (time-sharing, cloud computing), his work consistently pushed the boundaries of what machines could achieve.¹ His numerous accolades, including the Turing Award, Kyoto Prize, and National Medal of Science, attest to his monumental impact on the scientific and technological landscape.¹

His intellectual foresight extended to the philosophical and ethical dimensions of AI, anticipating debates on machine consciousness, free will, and the societal implications of AI's commercialization and military use.⁸ His enduring emphasis on common sense reasoning and logical foundations continues to inform contemporary research seeking to overcome the limitations of current AI paradigms, particularly in areas of explainability and robust generalization.⁹

McCarthy's journey, marked by both ambitious predictions and candid self-criticism regarding the pace of AI progress, offers invaluable lessons for contemporary researchers. His legacy calls for a balanced approach to AI development—one that combines technical innovation with rigorous philosophical inquiry, ethical consideration, and a realistic understanding of the immense complexity involved in building truly intelligent machines. His work ensures that the fundamental questions he posed about intelligence, knowledge, and the future impact of AI remain at the forefront of the field, guiding the next generation of AI contributors toward a future where artificial intelligence can truly serve humanity's interests.

Works cited

1.     John McCarthy - National Science and Technology Medals Foundation, accessed June 30, 2025, https://nationalmedals.org/laureate/john-mccarthy/

2.     John McCarthy (computer scientist) - Wikipedia, accessed June 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCarthy_(computer_scientist)

3.     John McCarthy Legacy - Confinity, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.confinity.com/legacies/john-mccarthy

4.     John McCarthy: Father of Artificial Intelligence - DataScientest, accessed June 30, 2025, https://datascientest.com/en/all-about-john-mccarthy

5.     A Mind for Machines - STANFORD magazine, accessed June 30, 2025, https://stanfordmag.org/contents/a-mind-for-machines

6.     John McCarthy | Biography & Facts | Britannica, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-McCarthy

7.     Guide to the John McCarthy Papers SC0524 - Online Archive of California, accessed June 30, 2025, https://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3b69r8ms/entire_text/

8.     John McCarthy: Pioneer of Artificial Intelligence - Citymatrix ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://citymatrix.com.tr/blog/john-mccarthy-pioneer-of-artificial-intelligence

9.     No Generalization without Understanding and Explanation ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/no-generalization-without-understanding-and-explanation/

10.  hai-production.s3.amazonaws.com, accessed June 30, 2025, https://hai-production.s3.amazonaws.com/files/2020-09/AI-Definitions-HAI.pdf

11.  The 1956 Dartmouth Workshop: The Birthplace of ... - Securing.AI, accessed June 30, 2025, https://securing.ai/ai/dartmouth-birth-ai/

12.  AI was born at a US summer camp 68 years ago. Here's why that ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://council.science/blog/ai-was-born-at-a-us-summer-camp-68-years-ago-heres-why-that-event-still-matters-today/

13.  Dartmouth Artificial Intelligence (AI) Conference | LivingInternet, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii_ai.htm

14.  John McCarthy - A Mind Behind Artificial Intelligence - YouTube, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6CCDyKD8mU

15.  The Future of AI -- A Manifesto | AI Magazine, accessed June 30, 2025, https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/1842

16.  The Tuck 360 Blog | Top Takeaways from the Dartmouth AI Conference, accessed June 30, 2025, https://tuck.dartmouth.edu/mba/blog/top-takeaways-from-the-dartmouth-ai-conference

17.  LISP | Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning & Programming | Britannica, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/technology/LISP-computer-language

18.  history - University of Bath, accessed June 30, 2025, http://www.bath.ac.uk/~masjap/TYL/history.html

19.  John McCarthy's AI Legacy and Impact - It-Jobs.de, accessed June 30, 2025, https://techjourney.it-jobs.de/en/it-heroes/john-mccarthy-the-pioneer-of-artificial-intelligence/

20.  Professor John McCarthy - Contributions and Impact, accessed June 30, 2025, http://jmc.stanford.edu/contributions/index.html

21.  Common Sense in AI: John McCarthy's Pioneering 1958 Vision - Startupsgurukul, accessed June 30, 2025, https://startupsgurukul.com/blog/2024/05/17/common-sense-in-ai-john-mccarthys-pioneering-1958-vision/

22.  AI's Origins: John McCarthy, the Visionary Mind Behind Artificial Intelligence - NowadAIs, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.nowadais.com/ai-john-mccarthy-mind-artificial-intelligence/

23.  Reminiscences on the Theory of Time-Sharing - John McCarthy - Stanford University, accessed June 30, 2025, http://jmc.stanford.edu/computing-science/timesharing.html

24.  A Brief History - Arcitura Patterns, accessed June 30, 2025, https://patterns.arcitura.com/cloud-computing-patterns/basics/origins-and-influences/a_brief_history

25.  John McCarthy: Father of cloud computing dies - Sam Johnston, accessed June 30, 2025, https://samjohnston.org/2011/10/24/john-mccarthy-father-of-cloud-computing-dies/

26.  Summary of 'Programs With Common Sense' (1959) by John McCarthy - Jack Hoy, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.jackhoy.com/artificial-intelligence/2017/02/24/summary-of-programs-with-common-sense-john-mccarthy.html

27.  PROGRAMS WITH COMMON SENSE - John McCarthy, accessed June 30, 2025, http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/mcc59/mcc59.pdf

28.  Tell YC: Answers from John McCarthy | Hacker News, accessed June 30, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=185348

29.  ASCRIBING MENTAL QUALITIES TO MACHINES - Formal ..., accessed June 30, 2025, https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/ascribing.pdf

30.  Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines. - DTIC, accessed June 30, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/tr/ADA071423

31.  John McCarthy & Artificial Intelligence, accessed June 30, 2025, https://schneppat.com/john-mccarthy.html

32.  John McCarthy - Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy | PDF ... - Scribd, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/9812123/John-McCarthy-Artificial-Intelligence-and-Philosophy

33.  SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - Formal Reasoning Group, accessed June 30, 2025, https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/mcchay69.pdf

34.  The Future of Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Robert F. Smith, accessed June 30, 2025, https://robertsmith.com/blog/the-future-of-artificial-intelligence/